Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Understanding Painful Nodules and the Rise of Biologic Therapy

Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Understanding Painful Nodules and the Rise of Biologic Therapy

Hidradenitis suppurativa isn't just a rash. It’s a relentless, painful condition that turns sweat-prone areas like the armpits, groin, and under the breasts into hotspots of deep, recurring lumps. These aren’t pimples. They’re abscesses that burst, drain, and leave behind tunnels under the skin - called sinus tracts - that won’t heal. For many, it starts in their 20s, gets worse over time, and doesn’t respond to antibiotics or topical creams. The emotional toll is just as heavy as the physical pain: isolation, shame, and constant worry about odor or flare-ups. But things are changing. Biologic therapy is now the most powerful tool we have for moderate to severe cases, offering real relief where nothing else worked.

What Exactly Are Those Painful Nodules?

The nodules in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) start deep inside hair follicles. It begins when dead skin cells and oils clog the follicle, triggering inflammation. The body’s immune system goes into overdrive, sending inflammatory cells to the area. This isn’t an infection you can wash away - it’s an autoimmune reaction gone rogue. Cytokines like TNF-alpha, IL-17, and IL-23 flood the tissue, causing swelling, pus, and eventually, scarring.

These nodules don’t pop like regular acne. They grow inward, forming painful, football-sized lumps that can last for weeks. When they rupture, they leak foul-smelling fluid and leave open wounds that heal slowly, if at all. Over time, these wounds connect under the skin, creating tunnels - sinus tracts - that make HS much harder to treat. That’s why early intervention matters so much. The longer you wait, the more scarring builds up, and the less likely any treatment will fully reverse the damage.

Why Antibiotics and Surgery Aren’t Enough

For years, doctors treated HS with antibiotics like clindamycin or tetracycline, hoping to calm the inflammation. Some people got temporary relief, but the nodules always came back. Hormonal treatments, like birth control pills or spironolactone, helped a bit for women, but didn’t touch the core problem: uncontrolled inflammation.

Surgery was the next step - cutting out affected skin, draining abscesses, or even removing entire sections of tissue. While sometimes necessary, especially in advanced cases, surgery doesn’t fix the underlying immune issue. Many patients end up with recurring lesions right next to surgical scars. It’s like mowing down weeds without pulling the roots.

That’s why HS was considered untreatable for decades. Patients were told to manage the pain, wear loose clothes, and avoid sweating. But now, we have something better.

How Biologics Work: Targeting the Real Culprit

Biologic therapies are made from living cells, designed to block specific parts of the immune system that drive HS. Unlike broad-spectrum drugs that suppress the whole immune system, biologics are like precision missiles. They zero in on just one inflammatory messenger.

There are three main biologics approved for HS right now:

  • Adalimumab (Humira): Blocks TNF-alpha, a key driver of inflammation. Given as a weekly or every-other-week injection. First FDA-approved for HS in 2015.
  • Secukinumab (Cosentyx): Targets IL-17A. Injected weekly at first, then every 4 weeks. Approved in early 2024.
  • Bimekizumab (BIMZELX): The newest. Blocks both IL-17A and IL-17F - two closely related molecules. Approved in mid-2024.
Each works differently. Adalimumab is the most studied, with decades of data from psoriasis and arthritis patients. Secukinumab and bimekizumab are newer, but show stronger results in head-to-head trials. In one study, bimekizumab cleared half the lesions in nearly 67% of patients by week 16 - far higher than placebo or even adalimumab.

A doctor giving a biologic injection as golden particles symbolize targeted immune blockers entering the body.

Efficacy: What the Numbers Really Show

Doctors measure improvement using something called HiSCR50 - a 50% reduction in abscesses and nodules without new ones forming. Here’s what the trials show:

Comparison of Biologic Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Biologic Target HiSCR50 at Week 12-16 Dosing Schedule Monthly Cost (US)
Adalimumab (Humira) TNF-alpha 41.8% 40 mg weekly or every other week $5,800
Secukinumab (Cosentyx) IL-17A 44.5% 300 mg weekly for 5 weeks, then every 4 weeks $6,200
Bimekizumab (BIMZELX) IL-17A and IL-17F 66.9% 320 mg every 4 weeks after loading dose $6,900
The data doesn’t lie: bimekizumab leads in speed and depth of response. But adalimumab still holds an edge for patients with heavy scarring - the kind that’s been building for years. Secukinumab strikes a balance between effectiveness and manageable side effects.

Real Patient Experiences: Relief, Costs, and Challenges

Real people aren’t just numbers in a trial. On forums like MyHSteam and Reddit, thousands share their stories. One woman in Ohio said her pain dropped from an 8/10 to a 2/10 within six weeks of starting secukinumab. Another man in Texas stopped wearing compression shirts after 12 years - something he hadn’t dared to do since his diagnosis.

But it’s not perfect. About 40% of users report injection site reactions - redness, itching, or swelling where the needle goes in. Some get colds or sinus infections more often. A third of patients stop treatment because of cost. In the U.S., even with insurance, out-of-pocket costs can hit $1,200 a month. Many can’t afford it. Medicaid approval rates lag far behind private insurance - only 45% of Medicaid patients get approved, compared to 82% of those with commercial plans.

The biggest lesson from patient communities? Start early. If you’re in Hurley Stage I or II - meaning you have isolated nodules or a few connected tunnels - biologics can stop progression. Once you reach Stage III, with widespread scarring and tunnels, biologics help control symptoms but can’t undo the damage.

Who Should Consider Biologic Therapy?

Biologics aren’t for everyone. They’re reserved for moderate to severe HS - what doctors call Hurley Stage II or III. That means:

  • Multiple abscesses or nodules that keep coming back
  • At least one tunnel connecting lesions under the skin
  • Failure of at least two rounds of antibiotics or other systemic treatments
Before starting, you’ll need blood tests: for tuberculosis, hepatitis B and C, and heart function. Biologics can reactivate old infections or worsen heart failure. You’ll also need to avoid live vaccines while on treatment.

Your dermatologist will track your progress using the IHS4 score - a simple count of abscesses and nodules. If you don’t show improvement by week 12, they’ll likely switch you to another biologic. Early responders - those who hit IHS4 ≤10 by week 12 - have an 80% chance of staying in remission for over a year. Late responders? Only about 40%.

A person standing freely on a porch, skin clear and healed, with fading shadows of past lesions behind them.

What’s Next? The Future of HS Treatment

The pipeline is full. Three new biologics are in late-stage trials:

  • Guselkumab: Blocks IL-23. Early results show 58% of patients hit HiSCR50.
  • Spesolimab: Targets IL-36, a pathway linked to skin inflammation.
  • TAK-279: A TYK2 inhibitor that blocks multiple inflammatory signals at once.
Researchers are also looking at combination therapy - pairing biologics with minor surgical procedures to clear out tunnels. One 2024 study found that patients who got bimekizumab plus surgical debridement had nearly 90% response rates - much higher than either treatment alone.

Even more exciting: a 2024 study identified a 12-gene signature that predicts who will respond to adalimumab with 85% accuracy. In the near future, a simple blood test might tell you which biologic will work best for you - no trial and error.

It’s Not Just About the Skin

HS isn’t just a skin disease. People with HS have a higher risk of heart disease, diabetes, and depression. That’s because the same inflammation that destroys skin also damages blood vessels and metabolism.

Here’s something surprising: patients on biologics often see their cholesterol improve. Triglycerides drop by over 15%, and HDL (the “good” cholesterol) rises. That’s not a side effect - it’s proof the treatment is calming systemic inflammation. For many, biologics aren’t just clearing their skin - they’re lowering their risk of future heart attacks.

What You Can Do Today

If you think you have HS, don’t wait. See a dermatologist who’s familiar with the condition. Ask about your Hurley stage. Bring a symptom diary - note when nodules flare, where they appear, and what makes them worse (heat, stress, tight clothes).

Stop smoking. Smoking doubles your risk of severe HS and makes biologics less effective. Lose weight if you’re overweight - fat tissue produces more inflammatory signals. Avoid deodorants with aluminum or fragrances - they can irritate sensitive skin.

Biologics aren’t a cure. But for the first time, they give people with HS real control over their lives. No more hiding. No more constant pain. No more feeling like your body is betraying you. The tools are here. The science is clear. What matters now is getting the right care, early.

  • Martha Elena

    I'm a pharmaceutical research writer focused on drug safety and pharmacology. I support formulary and pharmacovigilance teams with literature reviews and real‑world evidence analyses. In my off-hours, I write evidence-based articles on medication use, disease management, and dietary supplements. My goal is to turn complex research into clear, practical insights for everyday readers.

    All posts:

10 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Martin Viau

    December 31, 2025 AT 16:58

    Okay, so we’re talking about biologics now? Cool. But let’s be real - these $6k/month drugs are just pharma’s way of monetizing chronic pain. Meanwhile, in Canada, we’re still waiting for provincial formularies to catch up. Why does it take 8 years to approve a drug that works? And don’t get me started on the ‘off-label’ nonsense - if it works, just cover it. We’re not in the 90s anymore.

  • Image placeholder

    Marilyn Ferrera

    January 2, 2026 AT 09:06

    Early intervention is non-negotiable.

  • Image placeholder

    Robb Rice

    January 3, 2026 AT 07:20

    It's important to note that while biologics represent a significant advancement in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa, they are not without limitations. For instance, the immune suppression they induce can predispose patients to opportunistic infections, and long-term safety data beyond five years remains sparse. Additionally, the economic burden on the healthcare system cannot be overlooked - particularly in regions without universal coverage. A multidisciplinary approach, including dermatology, nutrition, and mental health support, remains essential.

  • Image placeholder

    Harriet Hollingsworth

    January 5, 2026 AT 01:10

    People are literally dying because they can't afford these drugs?? And you call this progress?? I'm sorry, but if your solution is 'pay $7,000 a month or suffer' - then you're not a healer, you're a predator. This isn't medicine, it's capitalism with a stethoscope.

  • Image placeholder

    Joy Nickles

    January 5, 2026 AT 16:49

    OMG I’ve been on Humira for 2 years and my skin is like… not on fire anymore?? But the injection site looks like a rashy spiderweb?? And my mom’s like ‘why don’t you just stop eating sugar?’ like I’m 12?? I hate people who think it’s ‘just hygiene’ - it’s not a zit, it’s a war zone under my armpits. Also, I lost 30 lbs and still flare. WHY IS NO ONE TALKING ABOUT THIS??

  • Image placeholder

    Emma Hooper

    January 5, 2026 AT 19:54

    Let me tell you something - HS doesn’t care if you’re rich, thin, or ‘clean.’ I had a guy tell me once, ‘Maybe you’re just stressed?’ Bro, I’ve got tunnels under my butt that could host a tiny subway system. Bimekizumab didn’t just clear my skin - it gave me back my dignity. I wore a tank top last week for the first time since 2017. Tears. Actual tears. This isn’t science. This is magic. And yeah, it’s expensive - but so is crying in the shower every night.

  • Image placeholder

    Deepika D

    January 7, 2026 AT 05:59

    As someone who’s been living with HS for over 15 years and now helps others in South Asia navigate this, I want to say - you’re not alone. In India, most doctors still think it’s ‘boils from poor hygiene.’ I’ve had to show them PubMed studies just to get a referral. But here’s the hope: biologics are changing lives globally. Even if you’re in a country where access is limited, start documenting your symptoms. Take photos. Find online communities. Advocate for yourself. I’ve helped three women in my village get diagnosed now. It starts with one voice. You’re not broken - your immune system is just loud. And now, we have tools to quiet it.

  • Image placeholder

    Bennett Ryynanen

    January 7, 2026 AT 13:59

    Bro. I was in the ER three times last year because my groin abscesses burst and I couldn’t walk. Antibiotics? Waste of time. Surgery? They cut out half my butt cheek and it came back worse. Then I got on bimekizumab. Six weeks later, I wore shorts for the first time since college. No joke. I cried in the parking lot. This isn’t just treatment - it’s a second chance. Stop waiting for it to ‘get better on its own.’ It won’t. Go see a derm who gets it. Now.

  • Image placeholder

    Chandreson Chandreas

    January 8, 2026 AT 08:30

    Just wanted to say… this post gave me chills 🥹 I’ve had HS since I was 19. Now I’m 32. I’ve tried everything. Even acupuncture. (Nope.) But when I started secukinumab? I felt like I could breathe again. Not just my skin - my soul. You’re right. It’s not just about the skin. It’s about being able to hug someone without fear. 🤍

  • Image placeholder

    Darren Pearson

    January 9, 2026 AT 03:24

    While the clinical data presented is statistically significant, one must critically evaluate the generalizability of the HiSCR50 metric, which is a composite endpoint susceptible to observer bias. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness analysis is conspicuously absent from this discourse. In light of the growing burden on public healthcare systems, one must question whether the marginal gains observed with bimekizumab justify its incremental cost over adalimumab - particularly when the absolute difference in response rates is less than 25 percentage points. A more rigorous, peer-reviewed economic model is required before widespread adoption can be ethically endorsed.

Write a comment